Radeon Rx 580 Vs 1050 Ti
Price now 327$ Games supported 90% Price now 281$ Games supported 84% Comparing of graphics card architecture, market segment, value for money and other full general parameters. Value for coin To get the index we compare the characteristics of video cards and their relative prices. Full general functioning parameters such equally number of shaders, GPU core base clock and heave clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you lot take to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked. Data on compatibility with other calculator components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). Parameters of memory installed: its type, size, double-decker, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors have no dedicated VRAM and utilise a shared function of organization RAM. Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (then-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of sure video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself. Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular engineering science for your purposes. APIs supported, including particular versions of those APIs. Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range. This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you lot find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, nosotros ordinarily fix issues quickly. This is probably the most ubiquitous benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics carte a thorough evaluation under various load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions nine, x, 11 and 12 (the last existence washed in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities. Criterion coverage: 25% 3DMark eleven is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, 1 being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is at present superseded by Time Spy. Benchmark coverage: 17% Deject Gate is an outdated DirectX xi feature level 10 benchmark that was used for domicile PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird infinite teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using stock-still resolution of 1280x720. But like Ice Storm benchmark, information technology has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced past 3DMark Night Raid. Benchmark coverage: 14% Burn Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two divide tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature seemingly made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic plenty graphics and is quite taxing on hardware. Benchmark coverage: xiv% Water ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete criterion, part of 3DMark suite. Water ice Tempest was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX eleven feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded past 3DMark Night Raid. Criterion coverage: 8% Cryptocurrency mining performance of Radeon RX 580 and GeForce GTX 1050 Ti. Ordinarily measured in megahashes per 2nd. Let's run into how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS. Here are the boilerplate frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions: +20.8% −20.eight% +42.ix% −42.ix% +96.8% −96.8% +42.nine% −42.nine% +42.9% −42.9% +295% −295% +72.9% −72.nine% +56.five% −56.5% +42.9% −42.nine% +42.nine% −42.9% −sixteen.seven% +16.7% +139% −139% +42.9% −42.9% +17.v% −17.5% +42.9% −42.nine% +96.ii% −96.2% −thirty% +30% +42.9% −42.ix% +262% −262% +73.3% −73.3% +57.viii% −57.8% +42.9% −42.9% +42.9% −42.ix% +84.6% −84.6% +66.vii% −66.vii% +133% −133% +46.nine% −46.9% +42.9% −42.9% +41.7% −41.7% +42.9% −42.9% +82.4% −82.4% +42.9% −42.ix% +97.2% −97.2% +73.2% −73.2% +82.2% −82.2% +69.two% −69.2% +42.9% −42.9% +25% −25% +42.9% −42.nine% +42.9% −42.9% +33.three% −33.3% +42.9% −42.ix% +42.9% −42.ix% +42.nine% −42.nine% +42.9% −42.ix% −20% +twenty% +42.9% −42.nine% +42.ix% −42.9% +82.8% −82.8% +42.9% −42.9% +42.ix% −42.9% +42.nine% −42.nine% +42.9% −42.ix% +42.9% −42.ix% +100% −100% +42.nine% −42.ix% −v% +5% +28.vi% −28.6% −16.vii% +16.vii% +42.9% −42.9% +106% −106% +42.ix% −42.9% +23.viii% −23.8% +107% −107% +105% −105% +42.nine% −42.9% Judging by the results of constructed and gaming tests, Technical City recommends AMD Radeon RX 580 since it shows better performance. Should you still take questions apropos choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall respond. Practice yous think we are right or mistaken in our selection? Vote past clicking "Like" push button near your favorite graphics menu. The nearest Radeon RX 580's NVIDIA equivalent is GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB, which is faster by ane% and college by ane position in our rating. Here are some closest NVIDIA rivals to Radeon RX 580: Nosotros believe that the nearest equivalent to GeForce GTX 1050 Ti from AMD is Radeon R9 380, which is slower past ane% and lower by 1 position in our rating. Here are some closest AMD rivals to GeForce GTX 1050 Ti: We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance more or less shut to those reviewed, providing y'all with more options to consider. Here you can encounter the user rating of the graphics cards, too as rate them yourself. Rate AMD Radeon RX 580 on a scale of ane to five: Charge per unit NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti on a calibration of 1 to v: Here y'all can ask a question almost this comparison, concur or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch. Graphics settings Screen resolution FPSAMD Radeon RX 580 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
General info
Place in performance rating 164 235 Value for coin 21.19 13.13 Architecture Polaris (2016−2019) Pascal (2016−2021) GPU code name Polaris twenty N17P-G1 Market segment Desktop Desktop Release appointment eighteen April 2017 (5 years agone) 25 October 2016 (five years ago) Launch price (MSRP) $229 $139 Current price $327 (1.4x MSRP) $281 (2x MSRP) Technical specs
Pipelines / CUDA cores 2304 768 CUDA cores no information 768 Core clock speed 1257 MHz 1290 MHz Boost clock speed 1340 MHz 1392 MHz Number of transistors 5,700 million iii,300 meg Manufacturing process engineering science 14 nm 16 nm Thermal design power (TDP) 185 Watt 75 Watt Maximum GPU temperature no data 97 °C Texture fill charge per unit 193.0 66.82 Floating-betoken performance 6,175 gflops 2,138 gflops Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface PCIe iii.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16 Length 241 mm 145 mm Width 2-slot 2-slot Supplementary ability connectors 1x 8-pin None Retentivity
Retentiveness type GDDR5 GDDR5 Maximum RAM amount eight GB four GB Memory bus width 256 Bit 128 Bit Retentivity clock speed 8000 MHz 7 GB/s Retentivity bandwidth 256.0 GB/s 112 GB/s Shared retentiveness no data - Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort HDMI + + G-SYNC back up no data + Technologies
VR Ready no information + Ansel no data + API support
DirectX 12 (12_0) 12 (12_1) Shader Model 6.4 half-dozen.4 OpenGL 4.6 iv.6 OpenCL 2.0 1.2 Vulkan 1.ii.131 1.2.131 CUDA no data + Benchmark functioning
Overall score
Mining hashrates
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) no data 326 Mh/south Decred / DCR (Decred) no data 1.01 Gh/south Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto) no data 12.62 Mh/southward Monero / XMR (CryptoNight) no information 0.3 kh/s Zcash / ZEC (Equihash) no data 156.48 Sol/due south Gaming performance
Full HD 98 51 1440p 43 31 4K 36 25
Low Preset
Medium Preset
High Preset
Ultra Preset
Loftier Preset
Ultra Preset
High Preset
Ultra Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 xxx−33 21−24
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 58 48 Assassin'southward Creed Valhalla thirty−33 21−24 Battlefield 5 124 63 Telephone call of Duty: Modern Warfare thirty−33 21−24 Cyberpunk 2077 xxx−33 21−24 Far Weep 5 83 21−24 Far Weep New Dawn 83 48 Forza Horizon iv 108 69 Hitman 3 30−33 21−24 Horizon Null Dawn 30−33 21−24 Cherry Expressionless Redemption 2 30−33 35 Shadow of the Tomb Raider 74 31 Watch Dogs: Legion 30−33 21−24
Assassinator's Creed Odyssey 47 twoscore Assassin's Creed Valhalla thirty−33 21−24 Battlefield v 102 52 Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−33 39 Cyberpunk 2077 xxx−33 21−24 Far Weep 5 76 21−24 Far Cry New Dawn 78 45 Forza Horizon 4 101 64 Hitman iii 30−33 21−24 Horizon Null Dawn 30−33 21−24 Metro Exodus 48 26 Red Dead Redemption ii 30−33 eighteen Shadow of the Tomb Raider 63 27 The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 72 49 Picket Dogs: Legion 30−33 21−24
Assassin'southward Creed Odyssey 34 24 Assassin's Creed Valhalla xxx−33 21−24 Battlefield 5 93 51 Cyberpunk 2077 30−33 21−24 Far Cry 5 71 36 Far Cry New Dawn 71 41 Forza Horizon 4 82 45 The Witcher three: Wild Hunt 44 26 Sentry Dogs: Legion 30−33 21−24
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−33 24 Hitman 3 30−33 21−24 Horizon Cypher Dawn 30−33 21−24 Metro Exodus 28 21−24 Ruby-red Dead Redemption 2 30−33 21−24 Shadow of the Tomb Raider thirty−33 21−24
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−33 21−24 Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−33 21−24 Battlefield 5 30−33 36 Cyberpunk 2077 xxx−33 21−24 Far Cry 5 30−33 21−24 Far Weep New Dawn 53 29 Forza Horizon 4 thirty−33 21−24 Watch Dogs: Legion 30−33 21−24
Phone call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−33 21−24 Hitman 3 30−33 21−24 Horizon Zero Dawn 30−33 21−24 Metro Exodus 18 nine Red Dead Redemption two 30−33 21−24 Shadow of the Tomb Raider 20 21−24 The Witcher 3: Wild Chase 27 21−24
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18 21−24 Assassinator's Creed Valhalla 30−33 21−24 Battlefield 5 37 18 Cyberpunk 2077 xxx−33 21−24 Far Weep 5 26 21−24 Far Cry New Dawn 29 14 Forza Horizon 4 41 xx Spotter Dogs: Legion 30−33 21−24 Advantages and disadvantages
Functioning rating 30.21 21.36 Novelty xviii April 2017 25 October 2016 Toll $229 $139 Memory bus width 256 128 Pipelines / CUDA cores 2304 768 Memory bandwidth 256 112 Chip lithography 14 nm sixteen nm Thermal design power (TDP) 185 Watt 75 Watt
Cast your vote
Competitors of Radeon RX 580 by NVIDIA
Competitors of GeForce GTX 1050 Ti by AMD
Similar GPU comparisons
User rating
Questions and comments
Source: https://technical.city/en/video/Radeon-RX-580-vs-GeForce-GTX-1050-Ti
Posted by: lopezfrompont1970.blogspot.com
0 Response to "Radeon Rx 580 Vs 1050 Ti"
Post a Comment